Skip to content
Kashif Ali

Why your password can’t have symbols—or be longer than 16 characters

April 29, 2013 arstechnica.com
Why are there so many password restrictions to navigate? Characters want to be free.
Daremoshiranai

The password creation process on different websites can be a bit like visiting foreign countries with unfamiliar social customs. This one requires eight characters; that one lets you have up to 64. This one allows letters and numbers only; that one allows hyphens. This one allows underscores; that one allows @#$&%, but not ^*()[]!—and heaven forbid you try to put a period in there. Sometimes passwords must have a number and at least one capital letter, but no, don’t start the password with the number—what do you think this is, Lord of the Flies?

You can’t get very far on any site today without making a password-protected account for it. Using the same password for everything is bad practice, so new emphasis has emerged on passwords that are easy to remember. Sentences or phrases of even very simple words have surfaced as a practical approach to this problem. As Thomas Baekdal wrote back in 2007, a password that’s just a series of words can be “both highly secure and user-friendly.” But this scheme, as well as other password design tropes like using symbols for complexity, does not pass muster at many sites that specify an upper limit for password length.

Most sites seem to have their own particular password bugaboos, but it’s rarely, if ever, clear why we can’t create passwords as long or short or as varied or simple as we want. (Well, the argument against short and simple is concrete, but the others are not immediately clear). Regardless of the password generation scheme, there can be a problem with it: a multi-word passphrase is too long and has no symbols; a gibberish password is too short, and what’s the % doing in there?

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

  • AT&T
  • password
  • phishing

Post navigation

Previous: Why LivingSocial’s 50-million password breach is graver than you may think
Next: Admin beware: Attack hitting Apache websites is invisible to the naked eye

Archives

Tags

Adobe Android anonymous Apple Biz & IT censorship Crime Cybercrime Cybersecurity Data loss data protection DDoS Exploit Facebook FBI Featured hack hacking Hacks and Cracks https intellectual property iphone Law & order Malware Mobile NEWS & INDUSTRY OS X passwords phishing politics privacy Scam Social networks Spam SSL Stuxnet Surveillance Tech The Courts The Ridiculous Twitter Uncategorized Vulnerability Windows Zero Day
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Design by obaydulla